The deliberate use of older cultural artifacts may be considered anachronistic by some. For example, it might be considered anachronistic for a modern person to carry a cylinder or write with a pen. Such choices may reflect eccentricity or aesthetic preference. It is only since the beginning of the 19th century that anachronistic deviations from historical reality have shaken a general public. C. S. Lewis wrote: Examples of parachronisms could be a suburban housewife in the United States around 1960 who used a washing board for laundry (long after washing machines became the norm), or a businessman in 2006 who wore clothes from the late 19th century. Often, a parachronism is identified when a work based on the level of knowledge of a particular era is read in the context of a later epoch – with a different level of knowledge. Many scientific articles based on theories that were later discredited have become anachronistic with the removal of these foundations, and speculative fiction often find that their speculations are overtaken by actual technological developments or scientific discoveries. After all, there are too many constitutional pitfalls and unanswered questions. In accordance with Article 5(2) GG, freedom of expression and information may be restricted by general laws in accordance with the standards laid down in the Basic Law and drawn up by the Federal Constitutional Court. These laws must be general and proportionate and respect the principle of interdependence (“interaction”) with respect to speech targeting objectives.
The reconstitution of Article 88a would require defining what constitutes a “written document”, a “public” or a “meeting” in the digital domain. It would also be necessary to be concrete how to define the act of advocacy on social media: would it be enough to “like” a post or a share/retweet would it be necessary? At a time when sharing and access to information is one of the main services of social media platforms (even if they are under attack for their content moderation policies, at least since Cambridge Analytica), one must refrain from restricting what can be shared in this way. In terms of proportionality, a new Article 88a should be “necessary”, i.e. fill a legal gap that is not yet sufficiently covered by other articles. However, there is no such legal vacuum when considering the provisions of § 1 para. 3 NetzDG: There are already many laws that restrict speech and criminal speech and punish speakers who insult (§ 185 StGB), who call for incitement to hatred (§ 130 StGB), who disseminate propaganda information about unconstitutional organizations (§ 86 StGB), etc. Last but not least, the actors involved should be clarified: should social media platforms be responsible for denouncing the unconstitutional defense of crime and strengthening their role as “guardians of the Internet” (Gillespie 2018)? Should prosecutors be allowed to search social media platforms as if they were public spaces? Although the German legal system generally allows for a restriction of expression (compared to the First Amendment), the ambiguity and abundance of issues in this case must be seen as a clear red flag. In the historical literature, the most common type of anachronism is the adoption of political, social or cultural concerns and assumptions of one era to interpret or evaluate the events and actions of another. The anachronistic application of today`s perspectives to comment on the historical past is sometimes called presenteeism.
Empiricist historians working in the traditions founded by Leopold von Ranke in the 19th century see this as a big mistake and a trap to avoid.  Arthur Marwick argued that “the understanding that past societies are very different from ours, and … very difficult to know” is an essential and fundamental skill of the professional historian; and that “anachronism is always one of the most obvious mistakes when the unqualified (perhaps experts from other disciplines) try to make history.”  Anachronism in academic writing is considered embarrassing at best, because in early 20th century science the use of Translatio imperii, first formulated in the 12th century, to interpret 10th century literature. [Citation needed] An anachronism is something that is out of place in terms of time or chronology. The word is derived from chronos, the Greek word for “time”, and ana-, a Greek prefix meaning “above”, “return” or “again”. In its first English usage, anachronism referred to an error in the dating of something (as in etymology, for example, when it is mistakenly assumed that a word or usage originated earlier). Anachronisms have sometimes been distinguished from parachronisms, chronological errors where the data is then defined as correct. But parachronism has not stood the test of time. It is now a very rare word. The falsity of a scripture is often discovered by directly mentioning or alluding to a fact that it directly mentions or alludes to a fact that follows the date, more or less indirectly to a fact that follows the date. Mention of subsequent facts; – first indication of infringement. In a living language, there are always variations in words, in the meaning of words, in the construction of sentences, in the way of spelling, which can recognize the age of a writing and lead to a legitimate suspicion of falsification.
The use of words that are used only after the date of writing; – second reference to falsification.  It can be an object, an idiomatic expression, a technology, a philosophical idea, a musical style, a material, a custom, or anything so closely related to a particular era that it seems strange when encountered at a later time. These may be objects or ideas that were once common, but are now considered rare or inappropriate. They can take the form of outdated technology or outdated fashion or idioms. Sir Walter Scott justified the use of anachronism in historical literature: “It is necessary, for exciting interests of all kinds, that the subject matter adopted be translated, so to speak, into the mores and language of the time in which we live.”  However, as fashions, conventions, and technologies advance, such attempts to use anachronisms to please an audience may have exactly the opposite effect, as the details in question increasingly belong neither to the represented historical epoch nor to the present, but to the intermediate period in which the work was created. “Nothing becomes more obsolete than a historical view of an older period,” writes Anthony Grafton; “A mother in a 1940s historical film shouts, `Ludwig! Ludwig van Beethoven! Come practice your piano now! We are overwhelmed by our suspension of disbelief by what was supposed to be a means of amplification and plunged directly into the American bourgeois world of the filmmaker.  For example, many books, television shows, radio productions, and films nominally set in the mid-21st century or later refer to the Soviet Union, St. Petersburg in Russia as Leningrad, the ongoing struggle between the Eastern and Western blocs, and the division of Germany and divided Berlin. Star Trek suffered from future anachronisms; Instead of “rebuilding” these flaws, the 2009 film kept them for consistency with older franchises.  4.
Pseudonymous comments are allowed, but a valid email address is required. The use of more than one pseudonym is not allowed. However, few have the width or bite of Bergen County`s blue law. The Sunday Closure Act prohibits the sale of clothing, furniture, furnishings, and appliances in this area of New Jersey, among other things. The penalty for an offender`s first and second offences is limited to fines; After that, prison is a possibility. The last time the county considered maintaining or rejecting this rule was in the early 1990s, when 65 percent of voters supported it. However, at least one group called Modernize Bergen County has tried to rally support for a repeal. A little-known fact: since the Alabama State Constitution was passed in 1901, it has been amended more than 800 times and is now the longest constitution in the world. Among the myriad provisions is Section 256, which imposes segregation “for white and children of color” in Alabama public schools. Several attempts to remove segregationist language have failed, notably in 2004 and 2012. Some commentators attribute the lack of deletion of the provision to the inherent difficulty of amending such a convoluted document. Others highlight political considerations.
In any event, section 256 survives more than fifty years after Brown v. The council abolished the doctrine of separation but equality. “Anachronism.” dictionary Merriam-Webster.com, Merriam-Webster, www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anachronism. Retrieved 30 September 2022. The usual policy of staying away from foreign conflicts, except when absolutely necessary, has become an anachronism. By 2030, I would say that we will see this problem in the rearview mirror as a picturesque anachronism. Vartges Saroyan is Deputy Chief Legal Counsel at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in New York.
The “re-enactment” of the battle, an even more recent anachronism, dates back to 1977. Article 88a was adopted in 1976 at a time when Germany was being rocked by far-left groups such as the Red Army Faction and the Revolutionary Cells, a period also known as the “German Autumn”. After a series of violent events, i.e. attacks, kidnappings and assassinations, the German Bundestag decided not only to sanction requests to commit crimes, incitement to violence and other incitement offences, but also to approve the threat to commit certain crimes. The purpose of my argument here is not to compare the acts of violence committed in the 1970s with today. Such a comparison would lead nowhere, as it is still difficult to measure the impact of online hate speech on events in the analogue world and because there is no certainty about the negative impact of social platforms on public debate (Emmer 2019).